Skip to main content

Not Standard NDIS

 Thousands of Australians with disabilities fought for decades to get NDIS put in place. The difference the scheme has made in people's lives over the past few years is almost immeasurable. People who couldn't get funding now can and participants like myself have the opportunity to go to different providers or even different states much easier. 

Growing up with funding models that made me rank my disability I missed out on the appropriate funding level because I scored highly on the physical disability components yet did not have the accompanying cognitive and intellectual disabilities. 

When the Morrison Government announced the new independent assessments, a chill went down my spine. I immediately heard echoes of my past. The way the new independent assessment tools were explained to me it sounded like a tick and flick way of getting participants less funding. 

Architects of the NDIS Scheme have said that the new approach is a way for the government to save up to 700 million dollars and reduce the size of participants' supports. 

How might they do this you ask? The government will engage independent assessors not known to the participant to do a tick and flick questionnaire which then sets the budget for the participant's plan. This budget cannot be challenged. As opposed to the current assessment criteria where supporting evidence is provided through reports from doctors and allied health professionals who have worked with the participant for a longer period of time. 

People with disabilities fear blowing up the scheme in this way could lead to deaths. I, along with every person with a disability in this country, asked Minister Linda Reynolds to keep her hands off our NDIS because I am not standard. 



I Am Not Standard


Access to NDIS shouldn't be decided by a standardised test

Because how does a questionnaire know what suits my disability best?

Why does pinching pennies have to leave me stranded? 

Just because I am not standard.


I have a name but now I am just a numbered participant.

How can a code explain all the challenges I have been sent?

My disability does not go away just by magic one day. 

Every time I am reassessed, I fear I will end up with less and end up depressed. 


How dare you take away my support and cheapen everything for which I fought?

I wish that I was born somewhat more uniform.

That way it would not seem like a National Disappointment Scheme.

I know you love your reasonable and necessary framework but I am outside your lines which leaves me stranded because I am not standard.


© Chris Van Ingen | 6 May 2021

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Than Politics

 Every election our vote is about more than politics; it says I am part of this nation and my voice will be heard.  This election is about Team Australia. Which leader has a plan to build Australia's future and who wants to divide us? This election is about more than politics; it is about stable leadership. It is about aiming high, looking forward, and thinking big.  My life has been about disability rights. I am living proof that disability rights is more than politics and this election people with disabilities' votes matter.  If I was American I would die. Medicare is the envy of the world. No less than two American presidents have tried to bring in an Australian Medicare style system. Universal healthcare is a human right.  All leaders have been saying that we live in uncertain times and as a result, thinking about acting in Australia's defence becomes about more than politics. We need to make Australia impenetrable to anyone that wishes to do us harm. We nee...

Circle of Life or Circle of Tech

 I have written extensively about how assistive technology helps me be independent. In blog posts such as More Than a Test Drive and Tony Stark's House (an Assistive Technology Dream) . My disability has turned the circle of life into a circle of tech.  Every few years I have to go through the assistive technology merry go round because all of my equipment seems to break down at the same time.  I am in the process of applying for a new hoist and sling, shower commode chair, bed, front door opener, and new abductor cushion.  I also am aware in the not too distant future I will have to attempt to try and get a new wheelchair. Every time I have to apply for a new piece of equipment my therapists and I have to make the case as to why that particular piece of equipment is 'reasonable and necessary'.  The frustrating thing about this is, even though it might be clear that I need a piece of equipment, one or two words in the funding form can make a difference on wheth...

A Philosopher Actor

 Centuries ago there was an ideal philosophical concept known as the Philosopher King . The idea being to be a great ruler you should be a philosopher because philosophy leads you to the best life where you are courageous, moderate, just, and wise.  I have modified this concept as my new approach to life instead of becoming a Philosopher King I aim to be a Philosopher Actor. It is said by the ancients that the aim of philosophy is to lead a good life. My good life is to be a good husband, man, and actor.  I recently have been doing a deep dive into Uta Hagen's books:  A Challenge for the Actor , and Respect for Acting . She advocates for an almost monk like discipline towards the arts and the acting craft.  I have always felt this level of commitment to my acting but I didn't want to be considered too extreme but after reading Uta's books I feel I have permission to do so. I have also been reacquainting myself with the philosophy of Schopenhauer and the Taoists....